I WAS incredibly moved by the story of Matthew Littlewood in the Nottingham Post on July 8.
Crohn's disease, its symptoms and treatment are not easy to talk about, let alone live with.
I read this on the same morning as my 26-year-old niece was waiting to go into theatre for a six-hour operation to remove the remainder of her bowel.
Diagnosed with ulcerative colitis two years ago, she has suffered recurring flare-ups and has been in constant pain, but has shown such courage and determination, continuing to work as an occupational therapist for as long as she could (a job she loves) and planning her wedding to the fantastic fiancé who has supported her through this.
A first operation to remove her large intestine left her with a colostomy bag and this second operation will leave her without the hope of a reversal. What an ordeal for anyone to go through, but for my beautiful young niece, with her whole life ahead of her, it just seems so cruel.
Thank you, Matthew, for sharing your story and being brave enough to talk about the details. It's important we all understand more about bowel disease so sufferers feel more supported and encouraged.
As for my niece, thankfully I know she is strong enough to grab exciting opportunities and live life to the full once she feels well again. After 12 weeks of recovery the rest of the family and I will enjoy every single second of celebrating her wedding in October.
Here's to her and her fiancé. You absolutely deserve every happiness.
SARAH HEWITT
Park Row
Nottingham city centre
I READ with interest your columnist John Charles-Jones, who is a local NFU delegate and who puts forward his views on agriculture.
Mr Charles-Jones writes questioning controls reducing the number of chemicals available to UK farmers, and links his argument to feeding what he calls ''a hungry world'' which ''would already be facing food shortages were it not for the availability and use of a wide range of agrochemicals''.
I would like Mr Charles-Jones to credit your readers with a little more familiarity with scientific method and rationally-constructed argument.
Such claims as the above are entirely speculative. My own view, and that is all it is, is that further use of such chemicals – which he advocates against developing resistance to organisms unwanted by some farmers – is a race to the bottom, with unacceptable environmental consequences that many of us taxpayers want no part in subsidising.
But let's consider some of the other points he puts forward as accepted truths: There is the ''hungry world'', which suffers mostly from distribution problems exacerbated by wars and corruption, propagated by interests motivated by corporate profit and sectarian hegemony.
Then there is the idea that local UK production has something to do with it, or could somehow mitigate these effects.
Top it all by the assumption that we all are not eating far too much already, and wasting a large proportion of food produced here and imported to the UK for our consumption.
I am very interested in reading about the personal business experiences of a local farmer. However, if the newspaper chooses to represent these as true opinion rather than NFU dogma, a contrasting view should be offered alongside.
IAN ROSE
Alverstone Road
Mapperley Park
WE have just requested a reduction in our direct debit from our gas provider EON.
As we are only using about £12 worth of gas per month, we asked for a reduction from £42 per month.
''Most definitely not'', we were told. No reduction, as you have to build up a fund through summer or you won't get your discount, which we think is about £5.
All these years we thought we were in control of our finances. But no, we are now being dictated to by EON! Has anyone else experienced this?
TREVOR and LORETTA PARKER
Middlebeck Drive
Arnold
LAST week we heard that Staffordshire NHS may have to charge for some treatments in order to cope with an ageing population. Now it seems to have spread to all areas of the UK.
Don't blame an ageing population, we have always had an ageing population. The majority of today's pensioners have worked for 50 or more years and during that time, paid their national insurance contributions.
I, like many others, mistakenly believed that I was contributing not only to my NHS care for life but also to my pension. It was only in later years that I realised that my contributions were paying for the rest of the population's NHS care and the pensions of the 'ageing population'. Governments should have been planning for this and it is morally wrong to penalise today's pensioners.
Some pensioners have, during their working lives, paid extra contributions into the pension scheme in order to have a few more pounds during their retirement. The Government has now decided that all pensioners will receive £140 per week, whether or not they have paid extra contributions, and those pensioners who were born before a certain date will not receive the increase.
How can this be a fair system? A loaf of bread costs the same, no matter when we were born.
Come on Mr Cameron, look at your policies and bring this country in line with fair policies for everyone; those who have worked all their lives should receive care and a decent pension, those who have been in the country for a few months should not be handed out benefits until they have earned them, we spent 50 years working for ours and they are not benefits!
MARION CLAY
Broadway East
Carlton
NOW is the time for Nottingham City Council to take responsibility for the fiasco with the tram lines.
Who in their right mind would not have set in place a penalty clause on each phase of this project from the outset? They blame unforeseen problems with the utilities and weather, when anybody with two brain cells can tell you it's bad management. The workforce is running this shambles.
We have young children who are trying to raise £100,000 for a new ward in the hospital. I for one would rather see healthy children running down the street than a tram rattling down it.
G HATFIELD
Charlton Grove
Chilwell
AROUND Nottinghamshire one of the questions being asked is: "Do we need parish councils?"
The situation arose because of allegations about two unitary councils being part and parcel of the boundary changes. Why?
Well, to save money, to cut the number of councillors needed and to lose the district councils.
In effect, it will make the more rural areas like Newark and Sherwood very small fish in a very large pond.
Many readers won't be aware of what parish councils do so have no opinion about it.
I hope there will be some that do and appreciate that if or when the regime takes over it is even more vital to keep them.
Parish councils are the first tier of democratic governance.
We deserve to keep them.
J COCKING
Gaitskell Crescent
Edwinstowe
THE consequences of job losses due to the impending closures of the Imperial Tobacco factory and Thoresby colliery will be far-reaching throughout Nottingham and Nottinghamshire.
Well-paid and skilled jobs will be lost, along with opportunities for future employment and training.
But how will these losses affect the areas which are seemingly remote from the employment?
For example, Gedling Borough, which is within travel distance to work of both employers, will encounter somewhere in the region of 70 jobs lost to current residents through both these closures.
Whilst recent initiatives by Gedling Borough Council in supporting apprenticeships and enabling development at Colwick and Netherfield are to be applauded, the same cannot be said for Arnold.
This area appears to be lacking support or initiatives from local council representatives.
Indeed, new job opportunities are seemingly solely reliant upon commercial considerations, not councillor commitment or local initiatives.
PAUL KEY
Castleton Avenue
Arnold